Impact of Catheter Ablation of Electrical Storm on Survival

Quick Takes

  • Electrical storm is a life-threatening condition in which catheter ablation is a highly effective therapeutic intervention.
  • Catheter ablation significantly reduces the risk of electrical storm recurrence in most subjects, and it improves short- and mid-term survival.

Study Questions:

What is the impact of catheter ablation on the short- and mid-term survival of patients admitted for electrical storm?

Methods:

A propensity score-matching analysis was performed on 780 consecutive patients admitted for electrical storm in four tertiary centers. Propensity score matching (1:1), based on the main characteristics associated with the use of catheter ablation or medical therapy alone was performed, resulting in two groups of 288 patients.

Results:

After propensity score matching, patients who underwent catheter ablation (n = 288) and those treated with medical therapy alone (n = 288) did not present any significant differences in the main demographic characteristics, electrical storm presentation, and management. Compared with medical therapy alone, catheter ablation was associated with a significantly lower rate of electrical storm recurrence at 1 year (5% vs. 26%, p < 0.001). Similarly, catheter ablation was associated with a higher 1-year (91% vs. 81%, p < 0.001) and 3-year (78% vs. 71 %, p = 0.017) survival after discharge. In subgroup analyses, the effect of ablation therapy remained consistent in patients aged >70 years, with substantial efficacy in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%.

Conclusions:

According to the propensity-matched analysis, catheter ablation-based management of patients admitted for electrical storm is associated with a reduction in mortality compared to medical treatment, particularly in patients with a low ejection fraction.

Perspective:

Electrical storm, an occurrence of at least three distinct episodes of ventricular arrhythmia requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in 24 hours, carries poor prognosis with a mortality rate of 24% at 1 year, with the majority of deaths occurring in the first 3 months. Prior observational cohorts, mostly small single-center series, have shown improved survival in patients treated with catheter ablation compared with medical therapy alone. Randomized clinical trials in this patient population are very difficult to conduct and are therefore lacking. The authors of this analysis pooled data from four referral centers and used propensity score matching to establish whether ablation conferred benefit on survival. Accounting for confounding factors, the use of ablation therapy was associated with a significant reduction in short- and mid-term mortality. The survival benefits associated with ablation were especially large in patients with low LVEF.

Clinical Topics: Arrhythmias and Clinical EP, Implantable Devices, SCD/Ventricular Arrhythmias, Atrial Fibrillation/Supraventricular Arrhythmias

Keywords: Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Catheter Ablation, Propensity Score


< Back to Listings