Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Coronary Intervention in Patients With Complex Lesions - OCCUPI

Contribution To Literature:

The OCCUPI trial showed that OCT-guided PCI of complex coronary lesions is superior to angiography-guided PCI for CV outcomes at 1 year.

Description:

The goal of the trial was to compare optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex coronary lesions.

Study Design

Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 open-label fashion to either OCT-guided PCI (n = 803) or angiography-guided PCI (n = 801). PCI was done according to conventional standard methods with everolimus-eluting stents (XIENCE Alpine or XIENCE Sierra, Abbott Vascular, Chicago, IL, USA). In the OCT-guidance group, lesion characteristics for device sizing and landing and stent optimization were assessed under OCT guidance. Post-stenting OCT evaluation (to assess whether optimization criteria were fulfilled) was strongly recommended, but not mandated by the protocol. In the angiography-guidance group, the determination of device size was recommended on the basis of the quantitative angiographic assessment.

Acceptable stent expansion was defined when minimal stent area was ≥80% of the mean reference lumen area, ≥100% of the distal reference lumen area, or absolute minimal stent area was >4.5 mm2 (for a non–left main lesion). Acceptable stent apposition was indicated by an acute stent malapposition <400 μm. Acceptable edge dissection was defined as the absence of major dissection (which, in turn, was defined as a circumference of the vessel at the site of dissection with an arc of ≥60°, length of dissection ≥3 mm, or deeper vessel injury [i.e., intramural hematoma, penetration into media, or adventitia] on final OCT). Stent optimization was defined when the acceptable criteria of these three components (i.e., stent expansion, apposition, and edge dissection) were met.

  • Total number of enrollees: 1,604
  • Duration of follow-up: 12 months
  • Mean patient age: 64 years
  • Percentage female: 20%
  • Percentage with diabetes mellitus: 33%

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age 19-85 years
  • Patients with ischemic heart diseases (including stable angina, unstable angina, and acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) who presented with typical chest pain or objective evidences of myocardial ischemia (positive invasive or noninvasive studies, electrocardiogram consistent with ischemia, or elevated cardiac enzymes)
  • Complex coronary stenotic lesions (>50% based on visual estimate) considered for coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stent
  • Definition of complex lesions (at least one):
  • AMI
  • Chronic total occlusion
  • Long lesion: expected stent length ≥28 mm based on angiographic estimation
  • Calcified lesion
  • Bifurcation (including all techniques, one- or two-stent)
  • Unprotected left main disease
  • Small vessel diseases with reference vessel diameter <2.5 mm
  • Intracoronary thrombus visible on the angiography
  • Stent thrombosis
  • In-stent restenosis
  • Bypass graft lesion

Exclusion criteria:

  • Severe hepatic dysfunction (≥3 times normal reference values)
  • Significant renal dysfunction (serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL)
  • Platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, a white blood cell count of <3,000 cells/mm3, hemoglobin <8.0 g/dL, or other known bleeding diathesis
  • Hemodynamically unstable during procedures or cardiogenic shock

Other salient features/characteristics:

  • Current smoker: 20%
  • Indication: Stable angina: 52%, non–ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI): 14%, STEMI: 7%
  • Median ejection fraction: 59.6%
  • Prior PCI: 41.7%
  • PCI indications: AMI (20%), chronic total occlusion (7%), diffuse long lesion (72%), calcified lesion (10%), unprotected left main trunk PCI (14%), bifurcation lesion (24%)
  • Number of lesions treated per patient: 1, number of stents per patient: 1, total stent length: 37 mm

Principal Findings:

The primary endpoint, major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization [ID-TLR], MI, stent thrombosis) at 12 months, for OCT-guided vs. angiography-guided PCI, was: 5% vs. 7% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.938, p = 0.023).

  • Cardiac death: <1% vs. 1% (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03-1.71, p = 0.14)
  • ID-TLR: 2% vs. 4% (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.69, p = 0.0022)
  • MI: 4% vs. 5% (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.45-1.16, p = 0.18)
  • Stent thrombosis: 1% vs. 1% (p = 0.12)

Secondary outcomes for OCT-guided vs. angiography-guided PCI:

  • All-cause mortality: 1% vs. 1% (p = 0.76)
  • Contrast volume use: 300 vs. 210 cc (p < 0.0001)
  • Procedure duration: 53 vs. 43.5 minutes (p < 0.0001)
  • Contrast-induced nephropathy: 1% vs. 1% (p = 0.47)

Interpretation:

The results of this trial indicate that OCT-guided PCI of complex coronary lesions is superior to angiography-guided PCI for cardiovascular (CV) outcomes at 1 year. The biggest reduction was noted in ID-TLR. This came at the expense of greater contrast use and longer procedural duration of PCI.

These are important data and add to the available evidence supporting image-guided PCI, especially for complex PCI. Greater contrast use with OCT did not appear to influence CV outcomes or contrast nephropathy, although it may be a consideration for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. These findings mirror findings of the recent OCTOBER trial, where OCT-guided PCI was superior to angiography-guided PCI for bifurcation PCI. On the other hand, in the ILLUMEN IV trial, routine OCT-guided PCI was not superior to angiography-guided PCI, but a benefit was noted in the complex PCI subset (population similar to this trial).

References:

Hong SJ, Lee SJ, Lee SH, et al., for the OCCUPI Investigators. Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with complex lesions (OCCUPI): an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, open-label, superiority trial in South Korea. Lancet 2024;Sep 2:[Epub ahead of print].

Presented by Dr. Kim Byeong-Keuk at the European Society of Cardiology Congress, London, UK, September 2, 2024.

Clinical Topics: Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Noninvasive Imaging, Interventions and Imaging, Angiography, Nuclear Imaging

Keywords: Angiography, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Tomography, Optical Coherence, ESC Congress, ESC24


< Back to Listings